I.
Aesthetic and Philosophical Statement
The Early Stages
S
ome
reoccurring aesthetic elements and iconography since my early development as an
artist have dealt with various subject matters such as social, political,
cultural and religious issues. For many years I have worked in defining my identity
as an individual, as Puertorican, as a minority, etc. By defining myself I
have been re-interpreting what it is to be me and have fallen in a never ending
cycle of re-assessing and re-invent myself as a Puertorican artist in both my
island and the United States.
I am, as pointed to me various
time by art critic and historian Alvarez Lezama as an existentialist artist.
Existentialism is a philosophical movement
that denies that the universe has any intrinsic meaning or purpose. It requires
people to take responsibility for their own actions and shape their own
destinies.
It has never been my intention to
create in any shape or form a negative discourse or to criticize society. I try
very hard not to place judgment into human behavior; instead I intend to create
a statement that will provoke analysis, by questioning our own individual existence
as we engage in a direct critical dialog. Of
course I do have my own beliefs and opinions and lots of discriminatory judgment,
I would be lying if I say I don’t, it’s my given right and nature as a human
being to do so; right? I view myself
as a chronicler / journalist, I continuously look at my life honestly and without any inhibitions, my
surroundings, my family, my heritage, people,
society, etc.; de-constructing and re-configuring to create work that tell
stories, that will engage the spectator into what I affectionately call the circus,
the spectacle of life.
Figure 1. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Metropol. Drawing mixed media on paper. 44” x 60”.
1997. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
My aesthetic / visual discourse
came to realization in 1997, with Shh, Shh, Shh, Silencio; Shh, Shh, Shh, Silence (Figure 2) large format
Drawing that earned an award in the Biannual of Casa Roig in 1994. But it was
not until 1997 with the work shown at the Botello Gallery that
my philosophical statement was solidified. Each work in this series was a clear
example of my visual language, but none of them where as direct to the subject/statement
as Metropol (Figure 1). Metropol illustrates my interest in the political
and social structure of the people and environment I was surrounded by in my daily
trips from Caguas to Old San Juan in a 15 passenger van “pisa y corre,”when
attending the School of Fine Arts. At that time I was researching German
Expressionism and stumbled upon a film by Fritz Lang titled Metropolis which
is still a significant influence in my artwork. This 1997 show at the Botello
Gallery catapulted me as one of the islands most promising artist and earned me
the recognition of one of Puerto Ricos’ most influential drawing artist of the
time. Sadly this show was to be the only drawing show I would have
done since then.
Figure 2.
Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Shh, Shh, Shh, Silencio Shh, Shh, Shh, Silence. Drawing
mixed media on paper. 60” x 50”. 1997. © Antonio
Fonseca Vázquez.
Figure 3. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Trazos de Identidad y Cultura, Traces of Identity and
Culture. Oil/mixed
media on linen. 77” x 110.” 1998. © Antonio
Fonseca Vázquez.
|
Figure 4.
Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Recordando
a Los Viejos, Remembering my Grandparents.
Oil/mixed
media on wood. 24” x 48 x 4.” 2003. ©
Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
|
My
visual and philosophical statement has been similar from 1998 to 2006. During
this period some of my most publically acclaimed exhibits have been; Viciones
Visions 2001, Recordando
Remembering 2004, Entre
La Memoria Y El Icono Between Memories
and the Icons 2004
and Doble Sentido Double Intender 2006.
Figure 5. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. La Marketa, The Market. Oil on Linen and canvas. 98” x 102.” 2001. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
Some
important art works from these shows that have become icons of my art career
are: La Marketa The Market, (Figure 5) awarded the third prize at the 34éme
Festival Internacional de la Pinture, Chateau-Museum
de Cagnes-Sur-Mer, Cote d’Azur, France, 2002. Trazos De Identidad Y Cultura Traces of Identity
and Culture (Figure 3)
awarded an honorific mention at the XXXeme
International Painting Festival of the Museum of Cagnes - Sur-Mer, Cote D'Azur, France in 1998. Memorias
Desconosidas Unknown Memmories”, Recordando A Los Viejos Remembering My Grandparents. (figure 7) and Toxicidad Social
Social Toxicity” (Figure 8).
Figure 6. Antonio FonsecaVázquez. Memorias de mi Niñez, Childhood Memories. Oil/mixed media on wood. 24” x 48 x 4.” 2003. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
|
Figure 7. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Memorias Desconosidas, Uncnown Memories. Mixed Media. Variable dimensions. 2003. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
Figure 8. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Toxicidad Social, Social Toxicity. Oil on linen and canvas, photo on canvas. 48" x 172". 2003. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
II.
The Evolution of My Sins
In retrospect there
is no definitive starting point in my work or research that could be consider
the beginning of my interest in religion as a subject matter. Religion has
always been an important element in my life and work. My parents, more so my
mother where avid religious people; religion, family, Sunday mass, becoming an
altar boy, church schooling, and so on, my involvement was so great that I even
contemplated becoming a priest.
Common practices in
Puerto Rican culture caught my interest. Altar pieces are customary in all
social circles, this altar pieces are clearly distinctive elements that conform
to Santeria. I noticed that for most people the idea of considering their
practice as Santeria was sacrilege. I believe that the ritual has transcended
its religious fundaments and has become engrained in Puerto Rican culture and
became national folklore. This phenomenon
might have taken place as a social response, as Puerto Rican people embraced
their nationalistic image in order to preserve their identity in the midst of invasions
/ colonization and eventually the fast emersion of American culture. Still
today many homes in and outside Puerto Rico have altar pieces, either as a space
to pray, a space to give homage to their patron saints, the dead or the living,
and so on. This altar pieces can be simple but are commonly gothic and over
decorated with candles, pictures, icons, miracles and other objects.
This series was extremely
inspiring; it gave form to my then thesis/research and helped solidify my aesthetic
and philosophical statement. Works such as; Olofín Oraciones a los Santos (Figure 9 and 10)“Olofín Prayers to the Saints”, and
Entre Páginas y Memorias (Figure 11), “Between Pages
and Memories.” The first was a series of hand pulled color lithographs
containing images and prayers; i.e. Oración a la Mano Poderosa “Prayer to The
Powerfull Hand,” Oración a las Docemil Virgenes “Prayer to the Twelve Thousand
Virgins,” etc. The second was a series of hand pulled color lithographs where Biblical
passages where used as references to a series of images that portrayed my
interpretation of that scripture as it related to my very own iconography. Some
of the works from this series are: Porque Tú Me Cargastes En Tus Entrañas, Leyes
sobre la Castidad, etc.
Figure 9. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. From the series Olofn Oraciones a Santos From the Series Olofín Prayers to the Saints. Top to Buttom: Oración A las Tres Divina Potencia, Prayer to the Holly Trinity, Oración al Sagrado Corazón, Prayer to the Sacred Heart, Oración a las 1,000 Virgenes, Prayer to the 1,000 Virgins. Color stone and positive photo lithography on paper. 8”x 18” on paper. 1999. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
Figure 10. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. From the series Olofn Oraciones a Santos From the Series Olofín Prayers to the Saints. Top to Buttom: Portfolio Cover, Credo, Creed, Colofón, Colophon. Color stone and positive photo lithography on paper. 8”x 18” on paper. 1999. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
Figure 11. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. From the series Entre Páginas Y Memorias From the Series Between Pages and Memories. Porque Tú Me Cargastes En Tus Entrañas. 1999. Color stone and positive photo lithography on paper. 8”x 18” on paper. 1999. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
These two series became the template to what would soon become my obsession with sin, evil, and human behavior. It was at this time that I first attempted to work with the Seven Deadly Sins.
Figure 12. Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. From left to right: La Virgen Del Platanal, The Virgine of the Plantains, La Virgen Desconosida, The Uncknown Virgin, La Virgen Borinqueña, The Borinquña Virgen. Positive photo lithography, silkscreen soft pastels and oil paint on paper. 36”x 26.5”. 1999. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
I
started with Sloth an 8’ diameter charcoal drawing which was shown in the
Boriken Gallery, Rhinebeck New York. I envisioned creating seven large format circle
charcoal drawings; but after many sketches and studies the only drawing that was
finalized was that of Sloth. I struggled and underwent extreme frustration as I
was attempting to formalize this series. Many artists have worked with this
subject and there are millions of interpretations to analyze and study with. One
would guess that such an overworked and researched concept would be easy to
work with, but in reality it never is, in fact it humbles you and forces you to
reconsider the relevance of your “new” interpretation. I did not want to repeat
what has been done and I definitely did not wanted the work to be an
illustration and/or a literal representations of the sins.
I kept sketching and
researching as I was working other series. At times it seemed as if I was
heading towards the right direction only to find even larger road blocks. At
this point the only concrete concept I had for the series was that it will be
done in paper, mixed media predominantly drawing, that the format was to be
monumental and that it will be set installation style to evoke a theatrical read
to the story.
Once again frustration made me
put the work to rest only for it to resurface back again in 2002-2003 as I was
working the series for the show De La Memoria y el Icono “Of Memories and Icons”, I started a large scale drawing representative
of Gluttony which was not shown in that exhibition.
Gluttony portrays a human figure
suffering of what seems to be anorexia, a slumber atmosphere with an
overwhelming sense of depression. A figure surrounded by an apple tree with branches
full of apple as it represents nature’s fertility. Patterns mix with the tree
branches create a balanced contrast with the figure, as the layers of bones,
muscles and human tissue coexist together in a well-balanced aesthetic beauty. People
who saw the work during process use to describe it as, “an image that attracts
you, that calls upon you due to its pleasant balance, craftsmanship and
aesthetic beauty only to be assaulted by the harsh statement of its subject
matter”. The drawing was shelved in 2003; I was still not satisfied with the
direction the project was heading.
In
2005-2006 I was working the series for the show Doble Sentido, when I created a
diptych “Adam and Eve.” With this image I intended to address the issue of
sexuality as a defining element of one self. By switching the sexual organs I
make a threat full statement about sexuality and its ambiguity. The question
was; am I a man because of my physical sexuality or would Eve still be the
first to sin if she was the one with the male genitalia? By creating a
contrasting and shocking statement, the spectator is forced to reconsider the
idea that gender is not necessarily what causes the events that provoked the
chain reaction of what will be considered the Sin of man. This work was only
shown once, at Arte America but was rapidly embraced by the public and gave me
the opportunity to re-introduce myself back in to drawing.
I realized at this point that my
primary issues with the series were due to the fact that I was not emotionally
and or at the necessary skill level to have taken such a challenge. The focus
needed to be broader and not restricted to the seven sins. I was to create a play
as if each panel was an act and tell the story of evil and Sin.
III.
It All Goes Back to Adam and Eve
Figure 13.Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Eve (Second Version). Drawing Charcoal, and zafron on paper. 72” x 50”. 1997. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
Figure 14.Antonio Fonseca Vázquez. Adam (Second Version), Drawing Charcoal, and zafron on paper. 72” x 50”. 1997. © Antonio Fonseca Vázquez.
After the first
version of Adam and Eve I revisited the piece “Gluttony” which triggered an
unstoppable flux of images and iconography. I
have designed sketched and laid out a series of at least sixteen images and have many more which in concept has the
potential of been at least a mile long installation. Another Version of Adam and Eve (Figure 13 and 14) soon followed. I decided
that in order to clearly formulate a dialog of Sin and Evil and its mythology/folklore
I was to begging at the very core of sin, Adam and Eve are of course obvious elements
to the story line. It is in Genesis that we get introduce to critical icons and
symbols that carry within them important elements to the story of good and
evil. The tree of life briefly mentioned in the narrative but an essential character
to the development of the story regardless of the uncertainty of the type of fruit
that was eaten.
I used the symbolism and iconography as follows: Eve, female,
one with nature the bearer of life, the similarities of her sexuality to that
of the fruit, etc. I attempt to establish a statement that makes her be the forbidden
fruit “the tree of Life.” That is why in my new interpretation of Eve an apple
tree finds its way out of her Vagina.
To follow such statement Adam reaches over to retrieve an
apple from this tree. The desire of the flesh, the call of his sexuality made
it easy for him to commit into temptation. In my work there is no argument of guilt on
who tempted who, but more so a dialog concerning human nature. Adam is not clear
of guilt, he is the snake, “phallic symbol” an image of power, fertility represented
in the drawing as Adams enormous penis, the snake, the trickster that calls
upon Eve’s and seduces her to commit sin. From this point on it all fell in
place the iconography the imagery, the story, etc.
Throughout all the
panels the reoccurring image of the apple trees gives the series the uniformity and
visual coherence to sustain the dialog. The linear progression of the story is
steady and easily conformed to my own personal interpretations and
visual iconography. Other images finalized as of today are: Second Act: The Snake
Man and the Apple Tree, Third Act: Lust, Fourth Act: Anger, Fifth: Envy.
I must honestly admit
that the end result is a bit uncertain, but one thing I know for sure, if the
end result embodies the intensity of the journey as of today, it will be one
hell of a ride...
To be continued…..
